Whew! Jaeger, Beanie, and I just got back from seeing Blast!. What an amazing experience. I cannot say enough good things about this show. All of the performers are top-notch and the music is unbelievable.

For those of you that are band geeks Blast! is what became of Star of Indiana. Star has always been innovative (first time I heard of them they were performing indoors with The Canadian Brass) and this seems to me to be a fairly natural evolution for them. They are definitely not your DCI-type corps any longer.

They show itself is remarkable. The arrangement of Malaguena they finish with will blow you away.

I cannot give these folks enough props. If they come to a venue anywhere near you and you care about instrumental music at all, GO SEE THEM. It's a little pricey but well worth it.

Many thanks to Jaeger for taking Beanie and I along. :)

...

In other news, TH, a friend and co-worker, has weighed in with some very interesting thoughts on _Requiem for a Dream_. He's kindly given me permission to share with you.

 Jared,  I saw you write about this on your page and wanted to comment.  Although,  like most of my writings, this will probably either bore you to death or  make you wonder if I ever talk to anyone else but my cats!  I was captivated by Requiem for a Dream.  Although it's one of the most  depressing films I've ever seen in my lifetime (right up there with Raise  the Red Lantern and Gia), it is also one of the most brilliant.  Except for one minor cliche (starting off happy in summer, descending into  hell by winter -- HOW MANY TIMES MUST THIS DEVICE BE USED IN  LITERATURE/MOVIES?), and the overused topic of drug addiction/junkies, the  film was extremely innovative.  The use of modern music coupled with classical sounds from the Kronos  Quartet made for a smashing soundtrack and immediately sets the stage for  the ominous climax.  How, after hearing that music, could anyone think the  film ends on a comfortable note?  There is only one track in the film that  makes one feel uplifted -- it is the one used in the early scenes between  Harry and Marion -- the beautiful piece with flowery strings  (Summer:  Ghosts of Things to Come).  Not only the music, but the sounds were fantastic, too.  You no doubt  noticed the sounds in the rapid-fire drug use scenes (click, drip, cook,  syringe, bloodstream, dilate, OH!).  But, did you catch the more subtle  sound of the refrigerator clicking and whirring up as Sara tried to  diet?  It's a sound that plagues me late at night when I watch movies.  I think the story about Sara must have been the least elementary and most  brilliant.  Upon my second viewing, I noticed things the director was  trying to show us about Sara.  Did you notice she was rarely seen without  sweets in the beginning?  When she went to get her TV, she was eating ice  cream.  Later that night, she ate a box of chocolates.  When she perused  her diet book, the most distressing things were the (no sugar) qualifiers  -- flashing on the screen while assaulting our ears with unpleasant  sounds.  Then, we understand.  When Sara eats her diet breakfast, the  grapefruit, egg, and coffee are consumed in rapid-fire, just like the  drugs.  When she gets the diet pills we further understand the connection  between Sara and the youth, as Aronofsky connects them with the same  rapid-fire sequences.  At first, Sara's habit is (grab_remote, click_on,  eat), then later is (grab_remote, click_on, click_off, grab_chair,  take_sun), and finally becomes (grab_remote, click_on, click_off,  check_mailbox, ha-ha-ha [it mocks her], pop_pill, slurp_coffee,  clean_apartment).  The end was a bit hard to believe -- ECT? without anesthesia?  ER patients  being arrested on the spot without proof?  A sex party arena in a NY apartment?  Were these peoples' addictions really drugs, or were they false hope?  I  think time must have been their biggest enemy.  In the case of Sara, I  don't think drugs were really her fix.  Her fix was sugar and TV, the drugs  were surrogates for the latter.  The younger crowd's fix was most certainly  drugs, though.  I did not understand a few things:  Why did Aronofsky choose to show us a  close up of an orange being peeled in the supermarket drug scene?  Was  Marion doing heroin with the boys?  Whatever she was doing was snorted, not  shot up.  Did Sara imagine the telephone call from the game show?  Can you answer this bit of trivia?  There were three things Tappy Tibbons  promised would change your life:  1. No red meat, 2. No refined sugar, but  what was number 3?  It was never verbally mentioned, but _can_ be garnered  from watching the film.  I'm afraid I've rambled on.  I'm curious to know what scene or cinematic  style most interested you. 

In case you have ever wondered, people like this are why I stay at TU. Thank you, TH :)

Extra

Links

fighting for freedom... in the heart of america
peep
Bad Dream
I would watch it again to re-evaluate my current position  on the movie (another depressing drug movie), but the  first & only time I saw it, I felt sick.    Watching shit like that makes me recall the  queasyness / anxiety felt before getting & doing hard  drugs, and also the horrible time after you take them,  waiting for them to kick in.  It also brings up bad  memories of friends lives ruined & ended short  (although not great friends I must admit, good people  that I respected).  It brings all that pain & condenses it  into a 2 hour time frame (or was it longer).  I know that there's other underlying commentary that I'm  missing, but I think that I'm missing it cause I'm so  focused on relating my own feelings & memories with  the poor saps in the movie.  Don't remember the  soundtrack, but I'll try to check it out on Gnutella.  Drugs are bad, m'kay? (unless you're talkin' about  booze, cigarettes, and chocolate)
m4dd4wg
eXXXploitation
OK, that subject was a little overdone, but I had a real hard time watching Requiem. To me, the movie was more stylistic exercize than discourse, and I was a little offended by the way Aronovsky used drug abuse as a launching point for his hyper-montage experiment. I guess I'm probably too close to people who have died and others who have had their lives sidetracked by drug abuse. (I don't know if I know Peep, so we may be thinking of the same dead pals.) Anyway, if there was depth to the movie, I had a hard time getting past the movie's style.
BTW, if you want to see a great movie about doing drugs, you should see Jesus' Son. It takes place in Iowa City, and I swear some of the things in the film happened while I was living in Norman.